A historicity in management research
| dc.contributor.author | Mudassir Farooqi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Naveed Yazdani | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-16T10:20:24Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-01-16T10:20:24Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This theoretical paper focuses on the application of pure empiricism in management research. The paper traces the ahistoric consequences of empiricism in management research. It first traces the evolution of empiricism as an art of inquiry based on Cartesian dualism. It then focuses on empiricism as a dominant methodology of management research. The paper also traces the consequences of empiricism and resulting ahistoricity in the form of gap between management research and practice, moral and ethical problems in organizations. The underlying question which the paper raises is the ahistoricity in management research as a byproduct of pure empiricist stance. The paper concludes by proposing that for the management research to be effective and useful for the practitioner it has to bring context specific knowledge of organizations. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Farooqi, M. and N. Yazdani(2013). "Ahistoricity in Management Research: A critique of pure empiricist stance."Paper presented at 3rd International Conference on Business Management (ICoBM), UMT, Lahore, Pakistan. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://escholar.umt.edu.pk/handle/123456789/940 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | 3rd International Conference on Business Management (ICoBM), UMT, Lahore, Pakistan | en_US |
| dc.subject | Ahistoricity | en_US |
| dc.subject | Empiricism | en_US |
| dc.subject | Management Research | en_US |
| dc.subject | Dualism | en_US |
| dc.title | A historicity in management research | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | A critique of pure empiricist stance | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |